Copyright The Boston Review
We are all familiar with what I will call the â€šÃ„Ãºidentity reflex.â€šÃ„Ã¹ We all hear the call of some tribe or another. We humans are a variegated lotâ€šÃ„Ã®differing by race, ethnicity, cultural heritage, religion, and political and sexual orientation. This is, of course, as it should be. Diversity is a good thingâ€šÃ„Ã®really.
Still, there are times when the call of the tribe just might be a sirenâ€šÃ„Ã´s call and when an excessive focus on â€šÃ„Ãºidentityâ€šÃ„Ã¹ could lead one badly astray. What is more, I firmly believe that now is just such a time.
At the close of what by all accounts has been a most extraordinary national political campaignâ€šÃ„Ã®one in which questions of identity have played a huge roleâ€šÃ„Ã®I believe it is important to at least raise (if not answer!), in a gentle and nonpartisan way, the question of what role â€šÃ„Ãºidentityâ€šÃ„Ã¹ ought to play in our politics and in our lives.
* * *
I grew up on the South Side of Chicago in the 1950s and â€šÃ„Ã´60s. A formative experience for me occurred during one of those earnest political rallies so typical of the period. Woody, who had been my best friend since boyhood, suggested that we attend. The rally had been called by the Black Panther Party and was intended to galvanize our communityâ€šÃ„Ã´s response to the killing by the Chicago police of Party activists Mark Clark and Fred Hampton during an early morning raid on their apartment in one of the cityâ€šÃ„Ã´s many all-black neighborhoods. I can remember even now how agitated about it we all were at the time. And judging by his demeanor, Woody was among the most zealous.
This was my earliest glimpse of the truth that racial identity in America necessarily involves an irreducible element of personal choice.
Despite this zeal, it took courage for Woody to attend. For, although he proclaimed his blackness often, and though he had descended from a Negro grandparent on either side of his family, he nevertheless looked to the entire world like your typical white guy. Everyone, on first meeting him, assumed as much. I did too when we had begun to play together a decade earlier, just after I had moved into the middle-class neighborhood called Park Manor where Woodyâ€šÃ„Ã´s family had been living for some time. There were a number of white families on our block when we first arrived; within a couple of years they had all been replaced by aspiring black families like our own. Yet, Woodyâ€šÃ„Ã´s parents never moved, which puzzled me. Then one day I overheard his mother declare to one of her new neighbors, â€šÃ„ÃºWe just wouldnâ€šÃ„Ã´t run from our own kind.â€šÃ„Ã¹ Somewhat later, while watching the film Imitation of Life on TV, my mother explained how someone could be â€šÃ„Ãºblack,â€šÃ„Ã¹ even though they looked â€šÃ„Ãºwhite.â€šÃ„Ã¹ She told me about people like that in our own familyâ€šÃ„Ã®second cousins who lived in a fashionable suburb, and on whom one would never dare drop in unannounced because they were passing for white. This was my earliest glimpse of the truth that racial identity in America is inherently a social and cultural, not simply a biological, constructâ€šÃ„Ã®that it necessarily involves an irreducible element of personal choice.
Evidently, Woodyâ€šÃ„Ã´s family had also been passing for white in pre-integration Park Manor. The neighborhoodâ€šÃ„Ã´s changing racial composition had forced them to choose between staying and raising their children among â€šÃ„Ãºtheir own kind.â€šÃ„Ã¹ This was a fateful decision for Woody who, as he matured, became determined not simply to live among blacks but, perhaps in atonement for his parentsâ€šÃ„Ã´ sins, unambiguously to become one. The boys in the neighborhood did not make this easy. Many delighted in teasing him about being a â€šÃ„Ãºwhite boy,â€šÃ„Ã¹ and most simply refused to credit his insistent, often-repeated claim: â€šÃ„ÃºIâ€šÃ„Ã´m a brother, too!â€šÃ„Ã¹
The fact that some of his relatives were passing made Woodyâ€šÃ„Ã´s racial identity claims more urgent for him but less compelling to others. He desperately wanted to be black, but his peers in the neighborhood would not let him. Because he had the option to be whiteâ€šÃ„Ã®an option he radically rejected at the timeâ€šÃ„Ã®those without the option could not accept his claim to a shared racial experience. I knew Woody well, and I wanted to accept him on his own terms. But even I found myself doubting that he fully grasped the pain, frustration, anger, and self-doubt many of us felt upon encountering the intractability of American racism. However much he sympathized with our plight, he seemed to experience it only vicariously.
I willingly betrayed a person whom I loved and who loved me in order to lessen the risk that I might be rejected by strangers in my tribe.
So there we were, at this boisterous, angry political rally. A critical moment came when Woody, seized by some idea, enthusiastically raised his voice above the murmur to be heard. He was cut short in mid-sentence by one of the dashiki-clad brothers-in-charge, who demanded to know how a white boy got the authority to have an opinion on what black people should be doing. A silence then fell over the room. â€šÃ„ÃºWho can vouch for this white boy?â€šÃ„Ã¹ asked the brother indignantly. More excruciating silence ensued. Now was my time to act. Woody turned plaintively toward me, but I would not meet his eyes. To my eternal shame, I failed to speak up for my friend, and he was forced to leave the meeting without a word having been uttered in his defense…
Click to read more
Glenn C. Loury – The Boston Review
Copyright The Boston Review